# Reviews Feature ID: `0x997f669d302a85:0x9b3821598508f012` ## Rating Average 4.0/5 across the latest 20 reviews. | Stars | Reviews | | --- | --- | | 5 | 14 | | 4 | 1 | | 3 | 0 | | 2 | 0 | | 1 | 5 | The owner replied to 25% of these reviews. ## Rating by month | Month | Reviews | Average | Owner replies | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2026-10 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2026-08 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2026-07 | 3 | 3.67 | 1 | | 2026-05 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2026-04 | 2 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2026-03 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2026-02 | 1 | 1.00 | 1 | | 2026-01 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2025-12 | 1 | 4.00 | 0 | | 2025-09 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2025-07 | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | | 2025-05 | 1 | 1.00 | 1 | | 2025-01 | 2 | 3.00 | 0 | | 2024-12 | 1 | 5.00 | 1 | | 2024-11 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2024-07 | 1 | 5.00 | 1 | | 2024-05 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2024-01 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2023-12 | 1 | 3.00 | 0 | | 2023-10 | 1 | 4.00 | 1 | | 2023-09 | 2 | 5.00 | 1 | | 2023-08 | 1 | 4.00 | 0 | | 2023-06 | 1 | 5.00 | 1 | | 2023-05 | 1 | 5.00 | 1 | | 2023-04 | 2 | 3.00 | 2 | | 2023-02 | 1 | 2.00 | 1 | | 2023-01 | 1 | 5.00 | 1 | | 2022-09 | 1 | 5.00 | 1 | | 2022-07 | 2 | 3.00 | 2 | | 2022-04 | 1 | 5.00 | 1 | | 2022-02 | 3 | 5.00 | 3 | | 2022-01 | 2 | 3.00 | 1 | | 2021-12 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2021-11 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2020-11 | 2 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2020-03 | 2 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2020-02 | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | | 2020-01 | 2 | 4.50 | 2 | | 2019-12 | 2 | 5.00 | 2 | | 2019-11 | 4 | 5.00 | 3 | | 2019-10 | 2 | 5.00 | 2 | | 2019-09 | 1 | 4.00 | 1 | ## Latest reviews ### 김성원: 5.0/5, 3 weeks ago ### Johni Dos Santos: 5.0/5, 2 months ago ### Eric Barbosa: 5.0/5, 3 months ago ### André: 1.0/5, 3 months ago > It's a shame that photography isn't allowed; it completely defeats the purpose of documenting the beautiful works of art in the museum. **Owner reply (2 months ago):** > Vamos rever essa questão sobre fotografar. Atenciosamente. ### Samantha Morbach Rosa: 5.0/5, 3 months ago ### Ivo Korytowski: 5.0/5, 5 months ago > With the Museum of Fine Arts undergoing never-ending renovations, art lovers with good taste are left with the Chácara do Céu Museum in Santa Teresa and this gem of a sacred art museum. Tickets are very cheap. The cathedral itself is a masterpiece of modern architecture. Some people complain about the photography ban because they've lost the ability to appreciate beauty without necessarily posting it on social media. ### SENHOR : PAULO. FILHO.: 5.0/5, 6 months ago > To truly understand Catholicism, it's necessary to know this place. The Catholic Church should never have initiated the Inquisition in the past. We know that the Second Vatican Council took place, and that Jesus Christ was unjustly crucified by the powerful Romans. The saints need to be venerated; they are our intercessors, and Mary Immaculate is known as the Mother of Our Lord Jesus Christ and has her due value. The best Popes of the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church were: Pius XII, John XXIII, and His Holiness Pope Francis. They were truly good, charitable men and followers of God, the Almighty Father, Creator of Heaven and Earth. Now, one should not use God's name in vain, as Brazilian politicians often do during election periods. God welcomes everyone, including the homeless, laborers, and poor peasants. God performed countless miracles and was persecuted in Israel for expelling the money changers from the Temple. God values forests and the environment because He created them with love and care. Please understand this. ### Angel Bondaz: 5.0/5, 7 months ago ### marcelo ramos: 5.0/5, 7 months ago ### yekai Yang: 1.0/5, 8 months ago > It's not open at all, don't go! **Owner reply (8 months ago):** > não estava aberto por conta do feriado do carnaval ### Carlos Matienzo: 5.0/5, 9 months ago > Excellent museum of sacred art. It's a shame that photography isn't allowed. ### MOISÉS: 4.0/5, 10 months ago ### Bruno Mendes: 5.0/5, a year ago > The cathedral is beautiful. Downstairs there is the museum of sacred art, which is worth a visit. Beautiful pieces from the 16th to the 20th centuries, from different places such as Brazil, Peru, Portugal, Italy and Bolivia.\\I would have liked to take photos, but I understand that they must prohibit it for security reasons. ### Júlio: 1.0/5, a year ago > It's a real shame that photography isn't allowed inside the museum. The works are old (therefore there's no copyright issue) and someone with malicious intent could discover a good part of the collection by finding photographs available on the internet (some even apparently taken despite the prohibition). Preventing visitors from taking photos, besides discouraging access to the museum, also hinders the democratization of access to knowledge, which should also be a concern of the Catholic Church. Those who obey the rule are the ones who lose out. A pity… ### Denise Dos Santos: 1.0/5, a year ago > I tried to visit the place twice on separate occasions (the last time was yesterday morning) and it was closed. It's worth noting that I only went because the website said it would be open. I suggest that the information be updated so that people don't waste their trip. This is quite common in Rio, by the way. From what I understand, I wasn't the only one to have this problem... I'm returning to my state tomorrow and once again I won't have the opportunity to visit the place. I've visited the Cathedral countless times; I only discovered the museum last year. **Owner reply (a year ago):** > Sentimos muito Denise, os horários estão corretos.Por alguma ocasião de haver um grande evento na Catedral o museu não abre por segurança, não sei se foi o caso.\Estamos aguardando quando puder estar de voltar, e obrigada pelo comentário.\Att\Equipe MAAS ### Jakob S: 5.0/5, a year ago > Wonderful experience. For free ### Heitor werneck: 1.0/5, a year ago > The website stated it would be open on the first. I arrived and, besides being mistreated by the doorman who raised his voice even though I am autistic, I had to ask if there was someone with intelligence and education to treat a human being and a tourist. This person shouted and refused to talk. Furthermore, if it was open on the website, it's an obligation, and it's a tourist city with many citizens from outside the country and from other states who should have access to the content. In short, zero points for the church, as usual, ostentatious, and for the education and welcoming attitude of the Carioca towards tourists and autistic people. Despicable. ### Giselle Batalha: 5.0/5, a year ago **Owner reply (a year ago):** > Muito obrigado Equipe MAAS ### Maria Cdr: 5.0/5, a year ago > Excellent example of sacred art. ### Valber Cecilio: 5.0/5, 2 years ago **Owner reply (2 years ago):** > muito obrigado pela visita